diversity_3 Children

What is a fact-finding hearing and when does the court order one?

A plain English explanation of fact-finding hearings in family court proceedings in England and Wales, when they're ordered, what happens, and how to prepare without a solicitor.

A fact-finding hearing is a court hearing at which a judge decides whether specific disputed allegations are true. It is separate from the final hearing that decides what arrangements should be made for the children. The judge hears evidence from both parties, which usually includes cross-examination, and then makes findings of fact on the balance of probabilities. Those findings then inform everything that follows in the case, including any CAFCASS report and the final hearing itself.

When does the court order a fact-finding hearing?

A fact-finding hearing is not automatic. Under Practice Direction 12J of the Family Procedure Rules 2010, the court must consider at the earliest opportunity whether a fact-finding hearing is needed. Courts order one where:

  1. There are disputed allegations that, if true, would be relevant to the final decision about child arrangements.
  2. Determining the truth of those allegations is necessary rather than simply desirable, given what is at stake for the child.
  3. The allegations concern matters such as domestic abuse, coercive or controlling behaviour, physical harm to a child or parent, or other conduct that bears directly on a child's safety.

Courts apply the tests of relevance, purpose, and proportionality. An allegation that would make no practical difference to the final outcome is unlikely to justify a fact-finding hearing. Courts have been increasingly rigorous about this since the Court of Appeal's guidance in Re H-N and Others [2021] EWCA Civ 448 and K v K [2022] EWCA Civ 468, which emphasised that fact-finding hearings should not be ordered unless they are genuinely necessary.

What is the standard of proof at a fact-finding hearing?

The civil standard applies: the balance of probabilities. This means the judge decides whether something is more likely than not to have happened. This is a lower threshold than the criminal standard of beyond reasonable doubt. A finding that an allegation is true does not mean the same thing as a criminal conviction, and courts are careful to make this distinction.

What happens during a fact-finding hearing?

  1. Each party files a written statement setting out the allegations and their response to the other party's allegations before the hearing.
  2. The hearing opens with any necessary procedural matters and preliminary issues.
  3. The party making the allegations usually gives evidence first, followed by their witnesses if any.
  4. The other party and their witnesses then give evidence.
  5. Each party may be cross-examined by the other party or their legal representative. Under section 65 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021, a party who is an alleged victim of domestic abuse cannot be cross-examined directly by the alleged perpetrator. Where this applies, the court appoints a Qualified Legal Representative to conduct cross-examination on behalf of the unrepresented alleged perpetrator.
  6. The judge delivers a judgment setting out their findings on each allegation, either on the day or at a later date.

What happens after the findings are made?

The judge's findings become the established facts for the remainder of the proceedings. CAFCASS takes those findings into account when preparing any Section 7 report and when making recommendations to the court. The findings will also be considered at the final hearing when the court decides on arrangements for the children. A finding of domestic abuse or coercive control will significantly affect how the court approaches the question of contact.

Can findings be challenged?

Findings of fact made after a hearing are difficult to challenge. There is no automatic right of appeal. An appeal requires permission and must show that the judge made an error of law or reached a conclusion that no reasonable judge could have reached on the evidence. If new evidence emerges after findings are made, a further hearing may be possible in very limited circumstances, but courts are cautious about reopening fact-finding proceedings.

What if I'm the person allegations have been made against?

If allegations have been made against you and the court is considering a fact-finding hearing, you will have the opportunity to file your own statement responding to those allegations. The hearing is adversarial in the sense that evidence is tested through cross-examination, but you are entitled to give your own account and the judge decides based on all the evidence, not on the allegations alone.

Going through a fact-finding hearing without a solicitor is one of the most challenging things a self-represented person faces in the family court. Access to Justice is built for people in exactly this position, it helps you understand what the hearing involves, what evidence matters, and what to prepare. Try it free.

Frequently asked questions

Is a fact-finding hearing the same as a final hearing?

No. A fact-finding hearing decides disputed questions of historical fact, specifically whether particular events or behaviours occurred. A final hearing decides what arrangements should be made for the children going forward, taking account of any findings already made. The findings from a fact-finding hearing then inform the CAFCASS report and everything else that follows.

What is Practice Direction 12J?

Practice Direction 12J is the court's guidance on how to approach cases where domestic abuse is alleged. It sets out what questions the court must ask at each stage of proceedings, including whether a fact-finding hearing is needed, what interim arrangements are safe, and what safeguards should be in place. It applies whenever domestic abuse is alleged by either party.

Can I represent myself at a fact-finding hearing?

Yes, but it is particularly demanding. The hearing involves giving evidence under oath and potentially being cross-examined, which many people find extremely stressful. It also requires you to cross-examine the other party on their evidence, which courts manage carefully where domestic abuse allegations are involved.

What is a Qualified Legal Representative?

A Qualified Legal Representative (QLR) is a barrister or solicitor appointed by the court to conduct cross-examination on behalf of an unrepresented party where the prohibition on cross-examination under section 65 of the Domestic Abuse Act 2021 applies. The QLR acts as a neutral cross-examiner and does not represent the party who cannot cross-examine directly.

Will my children give evidence at a fact-finding hearing?

Children rarely give direct evidence at family court hearings. Their views may be included in a CAFCASS report or conveyed through other means. Courts take seriously the need to protect children from the adversarial aspects of family proceedings, so it is very unusual for a child to be questioned directly at one.

What if the allegations against me are false?

You will have the opportunity to file a statement responding to the allegations and to give evidence at the hearing. The judge hears evidence from both sides and applies the balance of probabilities test. A false allegation that is not supported by the evidence should not be found proved. You can also raise concerns about litigation conduct with the court if you believe allegations are being made in bad faith.

This article provides legal information about family court proceedings in England and Wales. It does not constitute legal advice. For advice about your specific situation, speak to a qualified solicitor.

Facing this yourself?

You don't have to work this out alone. Family Court Assistant helps you understand your family court case, organise your information and work out what you need to do next, and every time you come back it remembers where you're up to.

Learn about Family Court Assistant Start your free trial
Access to Justice
Start your free trial